Process Biotechnology

  Microbial Biotechnology
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458 Vol. 14 No. 6, Issue of November 15, 2011
© 2011 by Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso -- Chile Received February 21, 2011 / Accepted June 28, 2011
DOI: 10.2225/vol14-issue6-fulltext-2  
SHORT COMMUNICATION

Expression and non-chromatographic purification of 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase in Escherichia coli

Wei Li1 · I-Son Ng2 · Baishan Fang*2 · Guangya Zhang3

1 Huaqiao University, The Key Laboratory for Industrial Biotechnology of Fujian Higher Education, Xiamen, PR China

2 Xiamen University, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Xiamen, PR China

3 Xiamen University, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, The Key Laboratory for Chemical Biology of Fujian Province, Xiamen, PR China

*Corresponding author: fbs@xmu.edu.cn

Financial support: This work was supported by Chinese 863 Program (No. 2006AA020103) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30770059 and 21076172)

Keywords: 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase, elastin-like polypeptides, Escherichia coli, fusion protein, non-chromatographic purification.

Abstract    

The gene dhaT from Klebsiella pneumoniae encodes 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase (PDOR). Thermally responsive elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) was used as a fusion tag to purify the proteins (PDOR). The ELP gene was attached to dhaT and ligated into the pET-22b vector. Different NaCl concentrations were employed to decrease the transition temperature (Tt) which was diminished as salt concentration increased. The optimal final concentration of NaCl was 1 M and the corresponding Tt was 39.5ºC. Enzymatic assays were determined via every step for purification of fusion PDOR. PDOR showed good stability during the purification process, the specific activity in the first and second round of inverse transition cycling (ITC) was 276.1 ± 13.3 and 213.3 ± 10.8 U/mg, respectively. The ELPs fusion PDOR was superior to histidine tagged PDOR in both yield and activity after the purification.

Introduction

1,3-propanediol (1,3-PD), a bulk chemical, can be formulated into a variety of industrial products especially in the synthesis of polytrimethylene terephthalate and other polyester fibers (Zheng et al. 2004). In the model organism, Klebsiella pneumonia, the glycerol metabolism primarily involves two branch pathways: the reductive branch and the oxidative branch. 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase (PDOR, E.C. 1.1.1.202) encoded by dhaT gene is the key enzyme in oxidative procedure, which catalyzes 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA), production of reductive branch into 1,3-PD under the consumption of reducing power NADH2 (Fenghuan et al. 2005). The crystallographic structure of PDOR, a type III Fe-NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase, has been determined to be a decameric structure with exactly the same monomer (Marçal et al. 2009).

Large-scale protein separation and purification are key problems in the current biological engineering. Purification procedures account for about 60% to 70% of the total costs (Lim et al. 2007). A variety of affinity based chromatographic purification schemes have been developed to simplify protein purification in the laboratory scale, for example, the fusion tag technique which greatly simplifies the purification of target proteins (Nilsson et al. 1997). Through the integration of a specific polypeptide (e.g., histidine tag), targeted proteins can be purified by high affinity or high specificity. However, the high cost of chromatography requires not only the special equipment but also the customized solid phase extraction. It is difficult to apply in the industrial scale owing to its low efficiency (Lim et al. 2007). Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs), derived from the elastin hydrophobic region, are oligomeric repeats of the pentapeptide Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly (where the "guest residue" Xaa is any amino acid except proline) that undergo a reversible inverse transition. They are highly soluble in water below the inverse transition temperature (Tt), but undergo a sharp (2-3ºC range) phase transition when the temperature is raised above Tt, leading to desolvation and aggregation of the polypeptide (Urry, 1997; Urry et al. 2010). As the result of this special character, ELPs have been widely used in protein purification and plasmid DNA separation (Kostal et al. 2004; Kim, 2005a; Kim, 2005b; Gao et al. 2006).

Previously, we designed a new type of ELP (i.e. ELP [KV8F-20]), which designated the guest residues to three amino acids, Lys, Val, Phe, in the ratio of 1:8:1. It had 20 pentapeptide repeats. The de novo designed gene was synthesized and successfully expressed in the host bacterium (Huang et al. 2011). In this study, we had PDOR gene dhaT fused with ELPs and expressed in two different E. coli strains. Histidine tag attached to PDOR was inefficient and complex during chromatography purification. We now report the application of ELP tag to separate PDOR from cell-free extract with satisfying results.

Materials and Methods

Materials and microorganisms

E. coli BL21 (DE3) and BLR (DE3) were conserved in our laboratory. Plasmid pUC19-ELP (Huang et al. 2011) and pUC57-dhaT (Li et al. 2011) were previously constructed. Plasmid pET-22b(+) were purchased from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). NAD was bought from Roche (Shanghai, China). Restriction enzymes were bought from TaKaRa (Dalian, China). All other chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade commercially available.

Construction of expression vector for ELP fusion PDOR

In Figure 1, pUC19-ELP vectors were extracted and double digested by NdeI and HindIII restriction enzymes. DNA fragments were purified and ligated into pET-22b(+), then the plasmid pET-22b-ELP was transformed into E. coli DH5α. The transformants were screened and tested by double digestion. The positive strains were sent to Genscript Co., Ltd. for sequencing.

We utilized PCR to amplify dhaT gene in the vector pUC57-dhaT and replace BamHI by XhoI. Upstream primer (5’-ACTTAAGCTTGCATGCAGGCCTCTGCAGT-3’) was in strict accordance with the sequence, but we added a palindromic sequence which recognized by XhoI in the downstream primer (5’-CAGCTCGAGTTAGAAGGCCTGACGGAAAATC-3’). Meanwhile, as the dhaT gene was inserted to pUC57 in reverse order owing to single restriction enzyme SmaI which would cause random directions, the correct forward direction was from HindIII to XhoI after PCR.

The purified gene with a length of 1211 bp was ligated into pET-22b-ELP, which had already been double digested by HindIII and XhoI. The recombinant plasmid pET-22b-ELP-dhaT was constructed and testified by single and double digestion, positive clones were sent to sequence. Between the ELP and PDOR genes, there was a transition interval, the exact position was from HindIII(606) to NdeI(644).

PDOR expression and activity assay

The transformed single colony was inoculated to 5 mL LB medium (10 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract) and cultured for 16 hrs at 37ºC. Then cell culture was inoculated to 50 mL fermentation medium (12 g/L tryptone, 24 g/L yeast extract, 3 g/L NH4Cl, 4.5 mL/L glycerol, 1.7 mM KH2PO4, 7.2 mM K2HPO4) for 2 hrs at 30ºC. The inducer, isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) was added to the medium at the final concentration of 1 mM. Induced E. coli were collected by centrifugation and broken up by sonication at 300 W for 2 sec operation and 2 sec interval with 60 cycles in ice bath, then centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 min to collect supernatant. The Ni-IDA resin was previously used to purify PDOR by affinity chromatography (Li et al. 2011). Proteins in the cell-free extract and purified ones were detected by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.

The activity of PDOR was determined through initial velocity method as described by Ahrens (Ahrens et al. 1998). Both cell-free extract and purified protein were analyzed by dynamic absorbance at 340 nm in potassium carbonate buffer. Enzymatic properties were studied by purified PDOR.

Inverse transition cycling purification and detection

Through the purification by inverse transition cycling (ITC) (Meyer et al. 2001), ELP fusion proteins were aggregated by increasing the temperature of the cell lysate to ≤ 45ºC and/or by adding NaCl to a concentration ≤ 2 M. The aggregated fusion proteins were separated from the solution by centrifugation at 45ºC at 15,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was decanted and discarded, and the pellet containing the fusion protein was resolubilized by agitation in the cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The resolubilized pellet was then centrifuged at 4ºC to remove any remaining insoluble matter. Two rounds of ITC were carried out. Purified fusion proteins were then determined by SDS-PAGE.

Optical absorbance at 350 nm of ELP fusion solutions in the 10-60ºC range was monitored on an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer equipped with a temperature control device. The Tt was determined from the midpoint of the transition-induced change at a heating rate of 2ºC/min. The Weibull model was applied to fit the transition curve, quadratic equation was used to regress transition temperature versus the salt concentration curve. Both curves were fitted by marquardt iterative and evaluated by correlation coefficient and F value. The calculations were performed in DPS 7.05 software.

Results and Discussion

Construction of expression vector pET-22b-ELP-dhaT

Two fragments were ligated exactly as designed and inserted correctly into the expression vector after sequential double subcloning operations. Single and double digestions were employed to verify the expression vector pET-22b-ELP-dhaT (Figure 2) and followed by sequencing for further confirmation.

The validated vectors were transformed into competent cell E. coli BL21 (DE3) and BLR (DE3). These transformants were cultured overnight in LB medium with 100 μg/mL ampicillin added and inoculated to fermentation medium to express PDOR under the induction of IPTG. Enzyme activities and the SDS-PAGE of cell-free extract were shown in the Table 1 and Figure 3, respectively.

Through densitometry analysis to target bands by Tanon GIS (Shanghai, China) from Figure 3, BLR (DE3) strain was better than BL21 (DE3) in the level of protein expression and with higher enzymatic activity. So, we used cell-free extract from BLR (DE3) in the following purification procedures. BLR (DE3) strain was especially suitable for expression tandem repeat sequences like ELP gene (Schmidt et al. 2007). From the analysis of the cell-free extract, our target protein lay between marker 50 and 71 kDa. The pure PDOR was 42 kDa and ELP tag was 10 kDa, so the fusion protein was approximately 52 kDa. However, due to the special structure of ELP, which caused the lagged band (20% greater than the molecular weight) in SDS-PAGE (Meyer and Chilkoti, 2002; Cho et al. 2008), the fusion protein was obviously higher than 50 kDa marker.

ITC purification and fusion PDOR stability research

In each round of ITC purification, fusion protein was resolubilized in PBS buffer to 1/30 of culture volume. The resolubilized fusion protein in each round was determined by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Figure 3, there was a sharp drop of protein impurities after first round ITC and hardly any protein impurities remained after the second round ITC was completed.

The relative turbidity was calculated by Meyer’s method (Meyer and Chilkoti, 1999). At first we determined the change of relative turbidity without NaCl. A sharp increase in turbidity was occurred within the range from 54 to 58ºC because of the aggregation of ELP in Figure 4a. The Weibull model was applied to fit the calculated curve, the equation was presented as following. R was the correlation coefficient; F value was calculated to identify if the regression model fit the data well, great F value meant that the independent variables had significant effect on the dependent variable; x means temperature; y means relative turbidity. Weibull model was suitable to depict dramatic changes in the short term, so this model was able to predict the results for temperatures above 54ºC (Figure 4a) more appropriately than that below 54ºC. Their mean absolute errors were 0.019 and 0.036 respectively.

 

[Equation 1]

Tt, defined to be the temperature at 50% maximal turbidity, is a convenient parameter to describe this process. The Tt for fusion protein was 56ºC when no salt was added and it was lower than that of free ELP (Huang et al. 2011), presumably because the much higher molecular weight of fusion protein contributed to the aggregation. Ionic strength effect was determined in Figure 4b: the transition temperature Tt decreases as the NaCl concentration increases, meanwhile, Tt and NaCl concentration show a significant quadratic relationship which x means the NaCl concentration and y means Tt value.

 

[Equation 2]

However, the transition temperature of fusion protein decreased less obviously than that of free ELP (Huang et al. 2011), especially when salt concentration exceeded 1.5 M. On the one hand, low transition temperature ensured the mild operation temperature in purification and alleviated the enzyme activity loss caused by high temperature; on the other hand, salt should be added the less the better (Lim et al. 2007). After a comprehensive consideration, we chose 1.0 M as the optimal NaCl concentration during ITC purification.

NaCl was added at the concentration of 1.0 M to the cell-free extract to conduct two rounds ITC purification at 45ºC, the specific activity of PDOR fusion protein was determined at each round. As we can see in Table 2, PDOR activity was enhanced significantly from 27.4 ± 0.5 to 276.1 ± 13.3 U/mg after the first round of ITC. Because the first round removed a large amount of impure proteins in the cell-free extract. Moreover, the enzyme was previously tested to be stable at 45ºC (Li et al. 2011), so the quick and simple purification operation retain on the enzyme activity. After the second ITC round, the specific activity decreased to 213.3 ± 10.8 U/mg as the loss of fusion protein during purification and the reduction of enzyme activity itself at 45ºC. The protein concentration after first and second round of purification was 0.18 mg/mL and 0.12 mg/mL to the final volume of 1.3 mL. When harvesting the same quantity of wet cells with purification by histidine tag affinity chromatography, the purified protein of histidine tagged enzyme (48 kDa) was 0.075 mg/mL at the volume of 1.0 mL and the specific activity was 50.6 ± 3.9 U/mg (Figure 5).

Our ELPs fusion enzyme was quickly and simply purified by two rounds of ITC in this study. Meanwhile, the enzyme activity retained a lot after purification and highly surpassed (14-fold) that of histidine tagged enzyme, their recovery rates were 14.0% and 1.1%, respectively. The recovery rate of the second round ITC decreased to 7.2% because of the protein and activity losses during process of purification. Therefore, first round of ITC was considered to be more appropriate for enzyme acquisition and enzymatic reaction usage, although the purity was higher after two rounds of ITC.

Many kinds of fusion proteins like thioredoxin (Lim et al. 2007), tendamistat (Meyer and Chilkoti, 1999), fluorescent protein, calmodulin (Trabbic-Carlson et al. 2004) have been successfully purified with ELPs in E. coli, enzymes especially oxidoreductases were seldom reported. β-lactamase was recombined with self-cleaving ELPs tag (Fong et al. 2009). The purification folds at room temperature and 37ºC were 15 and 9.9, which were quite close to our results. However the 110 repeats of ELPs tag they applied was much greater, molecular weight of β-lactamase was only 29 kDa. Because of the sensitive and vulnerable characteristics of PDOR, purification protocols were further studied and optimized. This is the first report for enzyme purification within the range of 40-50 kDa using the ELPs tag of only 20 pentapeptide repeats.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and insights that helped to greatly improve this manuscript.

References

AHRENS, K.; MENZEL, K.; ZENG, A.-P. and DECKWER, W.-D. (1998). Kinetic, dynamic, and pathway studies of glycerol metabolism by Klebsiella pneumoniae in anaerobic continuous culture: III. Enzymes and fluxes of glycerol dissimilation and 1,3-propanediol formation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 59, no. 5, p. 544-552. [CrossRef]

CHO, Y.H.; ZHANG, Y.J.; CHRISTENSEN, T.; SAGLE, L.B.; CHILKOTI, A. and CREMER P.S. (2008). Effects of Hofmeister anions on the phase transition temperature of elastin-like polypeptides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 112, no. 44, p. 13765-13771. [CrossRef]

FENGHUAN, W.; HUIJIN, Q.; HE, H. and TAN, T. (2005). High-level expression of the 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase from Klebsiella pneumoniae in Escherichia coli. Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 211-219. [CrossRef]

FONG, B.A.; WU, W.Y. and WOOD, D.W. (2009). Optimization of ELP-intein mediated protein purification by salt substitution. Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 198-202. [CrossRef]

GAO, D.; MCBEAN, N.; SCHULTZ, J.S.; YAN, Y.S.; MULCHANDANI, A. and CHEN, W. (2006). Fabrication of antibody arrays using thermally responsive elastin fusion proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 3, p. 676-677. [CrossRef]

HUANG, K.Z.; LI, J.J.; LI, W.; GE, H.H.; WANG, W. and ZHANG, G.Y. (2011). De novo design, non-chromatographic purification and salt-effect of elastin-like polypeptides. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 653-658.

KIM, J.Y.; MULCHANDANI, A. and CHEN, W. (2005a). Temperature-triggered purification of antibodies. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 90, no. 3, p. 373-379. [CrossRef]

KIM, J.Y.; O'MALLEY, S.; MULCHANDANI, A. and CHEN, W. (2005b). Genetically engineered elastin-protein a fusion as a universal platform for homogeneous, phase-separation immunoassay. Analytical Chemistry, vol. 77, no. 8, p. 2318-2322. [CrossRef]

KOSTAL, J.; YANG, R.; WU, C.H.; MULCHANDANI, A. and CHEN, W. (2004). Enhanced arsenic accumulation in engineered bacterial cells expressing ArsR. Applied Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 8, p. 4582-4587. [CrossRef]

LI, W.; NG, I.S.; FANG, B.; YU, J. and ZHANG, G. (2011). Codon optimization of 1,3-propanediol oxidoreductase expression in Escherichia coli and enzymatic properties. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 14, no. 4. [CrossRef]

LIM, D.W.; TRABBIC-CARLSON, K.; MACKAY, J.A. and CHILKOTI, A. (2007). Improved non-chromatographic purification of a recombinant protein by cationic elastin-like polypeptides. Biomacromolecules, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 1417-1424. [CrossRef]

MARÇAL, D.; RÊGO, A.T.; CARRONDO, M.A. and ENGUITA, F.J. (2009). 1,3-Propanediol dehydrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae: Decameric quaternary structure and possible subunit cooperativity. Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 191, no. 4, p. 1143-1151. [CrossRef]

MEYER, D.E. and CHILKOTI, A. (1999). Purification of recombinant proteins by fusion with thermally-responsive polypeptides. Nature Biotechnology, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 1112-1115. [CrossRef]

MEYER, D.E.; TRABBIC-CARLSON, K. and CHILKOTI, A. (2001). Protein purification by fusion with an environmentally responsive elastin-like polypeptide: Effect of polypeptide length on the purification of thioredoxin. Biotechnology Progress, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 720-728. [CrossRef]

MEYER, D.E. and CHILKOTI, A. (2002). Genetically encoded synthesis of protein-based polymers with precisely specified molecular weight and sequence by recursive directional ligation: examples from the elastin-like polypeptide system. Biomacromolecules, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 357-367. [CrossRef]

NILSSON, J.; STÅHL, S.; LUNDEBERG, J.; UHLÉN, M. and NYGREN, P.A. (1997). Affinity fusion strategies for detection, purification, and immobilization of recombinant proteins. Protein Expression and Purification, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1-16. [CrossRef]

SCHMIDT, M.; RÖMER, L.; STREHLE, M. and SCHEIBEL, T. (2007). Conquering isoleucine auxotrophy of Escherichia coli BLR(DE3) to recombinantly produce spider silk proteins in minimal media. Biotechnology Letters, vol. 29, no. 11, p. 1741-1744. [CrossRef]

TRABBIC-CARLSON, K.; LIU, L.; KIM, B. and CHILKOTI, A. (2004). Expression and purification of recombinant proteins from Escherichia coli: Comparison of an elastin-like polypeptide fusion with an oligohistidine fusion. Protein Science, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3274-3284. [CrossRef]

URRY, D.W. (1997). Physical chemistry of biological free energy transduction as demonstrated by elastic protein-based polymers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 101, no. 51, p. 11007-11028. [CrossRef]

URRY, D.W.; URRY, K.D.; SZAFLARSKI, W. and NOWICKI, M. (2010). Elastic-contractile model proteins: Physical chemistry, protein function and drug design and delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 62, no. 15, p. 1404-1455. [CrossRef]

ZHENG, Y.Y.; CAO, Y. and FANG, B.S. (2004). Cloning and sequence analysis of the dhaT gene of the 1,3-propanediol regulon from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnology Letters, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 251-255. [CrossRef]

Note: Electronic Journal of Biotechnology is not responsible if on-line references cited on manuscripts are not available any more after the date of publication.